In a stunning and controversial ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has authorized the deportation of migrants to South Sudan, a country rife with violence and a high risk of torture. This shocking decision comes after an emergency motion was filed by a group of eight migrants, who were initially held at a U.S. military facility in Djibouti. Despite a lower court’s ruling against their deportation, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, has defied this order, igniting outrage among legal experts and human rights advocates.

Norm Eisen, founder of the Democracy Defenders Fund and former White House ethics advisor, described the ruling as one of the most tragic in his 30 years of following the Supreme Court. He lambasted the court for its lack of due process, calling it a “MAGA Tribunal” that disregards the fundamental rights of individuals. Eisen emphasized that sending these migrants to a country where they could face torture is not only inhumane but also unconstitutional, violating U.S. statutes designed to protect individuals from such fates.

The legal battle intensified when Judge Brian Murphy of the District of Massachusetts had previously ruled against the deportation, only for the Supreme Court to override his decision. The urgency of the situation escalated as the migrants were swiftly moved to South Sudan, raising alarms about their safety and wellbeing. Eisen condemned the government’s actions as a “reign of terror,” aimed at instilling fear in migrants and deterring others from seeking refuge in the U.S.

As this crisis unfolds, advocates are mobilizing to challenge the Supreme Court’s ruling, vowing to continue fighting for justice and due process. The implications of this decision extend beyond the immediate plight of these migrants, threatening to reshape the landscape of immigration policy in the United States. This is a developing story that demands immediate attention as the fight for the rights of vulnerable individuals continues.