Meghan Markle is reportedly furious after a growing number of fans and social media users slammed recent photos of her children, Archie and Lilibet, labeling the images as “creepy” and “exploitative.”
Critics argue that the highly staged and carefully curated nature of the photos crosses a line, accusing Meghan of using her children’s images for publicity and branding purposes.
The backlash has sparked heated debates about privacy, parenting, and the pressures of growing up in the spotlight.
Sources close to Meghan say she feels unfairly attacked and insists that her intentions are solely to protect and celebrate her family.
The controversy continues to stir strong reactions, keeping the Sus𝑠e𝑥 family at the center of public scrutiny.
Meghan Markle ENRAGED after Fans SLAM Archie & Lilibet Photos as Creepy & Exploitative
In the relentless spotlight of celebrity scrutiny, where every family snapshot risks becoming fodder for viral outrage, Meghan Markle finds herself once again embroiled in a heated controversy. The Duchess of Sus𝑠e𝑥, known for her carefully curated public persona, recently shared a series of Instagram posts featuring her children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, during behind-the-scenes glimpses of her Netflix series *With Love, Meghan* Season 2. What was intended as wholesome family moments—kids on set, sharing headphones, spinning in chairs—has instead sparked a torrent of backlash from fans and critics alike. Accusations of the photos being “creepy,” “fake,” and outright “exploitative” have flooded social media, leaving Markle reportedly “enraged” at what she sees as hypocritical attacks on her motherhood. As the Sus𝑠e𝑥 brand teeters between empowerment and commercialization, this latest uproar exposes the fragile line between privacy and publicity, raising damning questions about whether Markle is prioritizing profit over her children’s well-being.
The firestorm began on September 1, 2025, when Markle posted a carousel of images from the *With Love, Meghan* set, including rare shots of 6-year-old Archie and 4-year-old Lilibet. The photos showed the siblings from behind, their red hair—a genetic nod to father Prince Harry—prominently displayed as they engaged in playful activities like holding a clapperboard and watching their mother work. Markle captioned it affectionately: “Family time on set—nothing beats it.” But the internet’s response was anything but warm. Within hours, X (formerly Twitter) exploded with claims that the images were manipulated, with users dissecting every detail for signs of Photoshop or AI tampering. “All AI detectors are red flagging this image as fake,” one user fumed, calling for a “wellness check” on the children and questioning their very existence. Another labeled the shots “creepy photoshopped / AI-generated / manipulative pics,” speculating if the kids were “rent-a-tots.”
This isn’t the first time Markle’s family photos have drawn such venom. Earlier in the year, a Mother’s Day snap sparked wild theories about inconsistencies in Lilibet’s appearance, with critics calling it “bonkers” and pointing to “strange details” like unkempt hair and barefoot poses. Fans accused her of editing Archie and Lilibet into Disneyland photos, claiming “it looks like a bad AI job.” A Christmas card from December 2024 ignited similar conspiracies, with users branding it a “fraudulent” Photoshop job and wondering if the Sus𝑠e𝑥es used “AI children” in a “deliberately blurred image.” Even a black-and-white birthday post for Lilibet in June 2025 drew backlash for allegedly “doctored” elements, fueling online outrage. The recurring theme? These images feel “unnatural,” “disturbing,” and “staged,” lacking genuine warmth and reeking of calculation.
The “creepy” factor escalates with the obscured faces and awkward poses, which critics argue create an eerie, voyeuristic vibe rather than protect privacy. “Doesn’t #MeghanMarkle know how to brush Betty’s hair & why is she barefoot? Why does Archie look so uncomfortable?” one X user questioned, decrying the children as “props” in unhappy family scenes. Another post slammed a photo of Archie “adoring” his mother as “disturbing” and “unnatural,” with no “love or warmth” from Markle. Royal watchers on Reddit and X have long speculated about red hair claims, accusing Markle of photoshopping to “boost public interest” in her kids’ rarity. “Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are trash: ‘F–king Grifters’, they exploit so-called ‘Archie’ & ‘Lilibet’ (rent-a-tots?) as props to cash in,” raged another, tying the creepiness to alleged commercialization.
But it’s the exploitative accusations that cut deepest, painting Markle as a hypocrite who preaches privacy while peddling her family for profit. Insiders reveal that Prince Harry is “infuriated” by the posts, reportedly preferring his children remain unseen amid ongoing privacy battles. Critics point to the timing: The set photos dropped just before *With Love, Meghan* Season 2 premiered, conveniently boosting hype for a show already criticized as “self-indulgent.” “Meghan Markle accused of using her kids as ‘products’ to promote her Netflix show,” headlines blared, with fans slamming her for “dumping his info out there” via identifiable details like soccer school locations. Royal expert Tom Bower blasted it as “hypocrisy and crude profiteering,” while former MP Anna Firth called it “appalling” use of children as “clickbait” to drive sales for her As Ever brand. “More photos of Archie and Lilibet, strategically placed to merch products and projects… Everything she does is for dollar signs and it’s disgusting,” one X user echoed.
Markle’s rage, sources say, boils from a perceived double standard. She’s long championed her family’s privacy, citing tabloid trauma in her Oprah interview and Netflix docuseries. Yet, as her ventures—like As Ever jams and Netflix deals—struggle for traction, she’s increasingly incorporated family glimpses, from Disneyland outings to garden moments. A friend confided: “Meghan is enraged because these are authentic family joys, but haters twist them into something sinister.” Critics counter that her “obsessive” privacy is selective, “except when it suits them.” Even a WellChild repost via Hello Magazine drew ire for “exploiting sick kids” for likes.
This pattern harks back to Megxit in 2020, when the Sus𝑠e𝑥es fled royal life decrying media intrusion, only to secure multimillion deals exposing their narrative. Now, experts warn of long-term fallout: Royal author Hugo Vickers predicts Archie and Lilibet will be “very annoyed” upon realizing they’ve been “used in all these posts in a strange way,” potentially resenting their obscured, manipulated portrayals. “There’s gonna be a terrible revenge when those children grow up,” he cautioned, noting they’ll question missing royal ties. Commentator Richard Fitzwilliams dubbed Markle “ruthless,” exploiting kids for attention.
Critically, this scandal unmasks Markle’s brand as built on contradiction: Advocating against social media’s dangers while “dumping” her kids’ info online; shielding faces yet teasing presences for mystery and engagement. Moms online raged at an “awkward” moment with Lilibet, likening Markle’s affection to “petting a dog” amid the child’s unkempt look. “If Archie is real—This picture is depressing and lonely,” one post lamented, accusing exploitation and isolation. Even positive spins, like crew members calling her “attentive,” can’t drown the chorus decrying “blatant inconsistencies” in “shoddily edited photos.”
As Markle fumes in Montecito, her team dismisses the backlash as “baseless” from “royal racists.” But with *With Love, Meghan* facing tepid reviews and As Ever sales sluggish, this controversy could erode her empire further. Viewership is down, per insiders, and the optics of “using children with royal titles as a marketing tool” aren’t helping. In the end, Markle’s enraged defiance may be her undoing—alienating fans who once saw her as a trailblazing mom, now viewing her as a grifter dangling her kids for clout. The real tragedy? Archie and Lilibet, unwitting pawns in a media game that may scar them forever. As one expert quipped, privacy for the Sus𝑠e𝑥es is “totally pointless” when blurred by ambition. The saga continues, but one thing’s clear: In the court of public opinion, the duchess’s crown is slipping.