In a stunning political showdown, former President Donald Trump claims he spoke with California Governor Gavin Newsom about deploying the National Guard, only for Newsom to flatly deny the conversation ever took place. The tension escalated as Trump, in a press briefing, accused Newsom of “doing a bad job” amid rising unrest, asserting that without federal intervention, Los Angeles would be engulfed in chaos. However, Newsom responded with a swift and pointed rebuttal, tweeting, “There was no call, not even a voicemail. Americans should be alarmed that a president deploying Marines into our streets doesn’t even know who he’s talking to.”

As the drama unfolded, Trump’s team scrambled to provide evidence of the alleged call, presenting a log showing a brief outgoing call followed by a longer one on June 7—two days prior to Trump’s claims. This revelation only deepened the controversy, as Newsom clarified that their conversation did not touch on the National Guard, calling Trump a “stone cold liar.” The stakes are high, as California’s Attorney General announced plans to seek a temporary restraining order against Trump’s deployment of the National Guard, arguing that the president lacks legal grounds for such action without proper consultation with the governor.

Legal experts warn that Trump’s actions could have severe implications, questioning the legality of deploying military forces without state approval. As tensions rise and the clock ticks, California’s legal battle against Trump’s directive could unfold rapidly, potentially leading to a court ruling within hours or days. This explosive confrontation not only highlights the fraught relationship between state and federal powers but also raises critical questions about accountability and governance in a time of crisis. The nation watches closely as this high-stakes political drama continues to develop.